June 2002 Issue
Please spread the message of health by forwarding
this email newsletter onto anyone you feel could benefit from it. Let us
know what you think of this newsletter by replying to this email. If you
feel you have received this newsletter in error please email us and we will
remove you from our list. Thank you.
In this issue:
-
Chiropractors Mobilize to Protect
Children's Rights
-
States Told to Monitor Drug
Prescriptions
-
Chiropractic's Role in Sports
-
New Drugs Have Side Effects
-
Association Between Duration of
Breastfeeding and Adult Intelligence
-
More Children Taking Central Nervous
System Drugs
Chiropractors Mobilize
to Protect Children's Rights
Manitoba,
Canada has become the focal point of a heated battle by the chiropractic
profession to protect the rights of children to receive the benefits of
chiropractic care. Over the past year several anti-chiropractic forces
have started a false smear campaign to gain publicity by trying to say that
chiropractic care may be dangerous. This flies in the face of all
evidence showing that chiropractic has always been among the safest health
care professions.
In spite of facts to the contrary the
Canadian smear campaign has been effective and accomplished their first goal
in getting the government of Manitoba to discontinue chiropractic coverage
for children up to the age of 19. This move effectively forces many
children away from a natural choice of chiropractic and toward drugs or
surgery. In a statement dated May, 10, 2002, one of the world's
renowned chiropractic pediatric experts, Dr. Maxine McMullen Vice President
of the International Chiropractors Association (ICA) and founder and
president of the ICA Council of Chiropractic Pediatrics stated, "This
decision is not based on science or good health care practice.
Chiropractic care has been proven to be safe and effective for children and
people of all ages. This decision is based in fear and not in fact. The
world chiropractic community will mobilize to take those steps necessary to
see that fairness and open access for all people prevail."
Other chiropractic organizations have also
begun to mobilize. In a release dated May, 8, 2002 Dr. Jeanne Ohm,
Secretary of the International
Chiropractic Pediatric Association asked all their members to,
"Please e-mail the Premier of Manitoba, the Honorable Gary Doer with a
short, professional e-mail on behalf of chiropractic care for children. Take
the moment now to turn this around. His address: Premier@leg.gov.mb.ca
.
In the 1970's the American Medical
Association was sued for restraint of trade and antitrust activities.
In that famous "Wilk vs. AMA suit", the AMA lost, and had to
publicly admit wrongdoing in their journals as well as cease any illegal and
unlawful activity against chiropractic. Since then the AMA has
been barred from the types of false smear campaigns in the US that have now
taken place in Canada. The chiropractic community and the patients we
serve are continuing to mobilize to reverse this situation. It is our
belief that everyone should have open access to chiropractic care if that is
the form of health care they choose.
States
Told to Monitor Drug Prescriptions
The
head of the US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), Asa Hutchinson, is
calling for all 50 states to establish programs to track prescriptions of
schedule II drugs. This story appears in the April 22 - 29, 2002 issue
of the American Medical News, reporting on the National Association of
Attorneys General meeting. On March 22, DEA administrator, Asa
Hutchinson spoke and urged the leading legal officers of each state to
consider instituting monitoring programs in their home jurisdictions.
Presently 18 states have already initiated some type of
prescription-monitoring program.
To put their money where
their federal mouth is, the
U.S.
Department of Justice has set aside $2 million in grant money to help states
set up their own programs. This move has come about because of, what the
story describes as the "epidemic" of pain medication
prescriptions, especially the popular drug OxyContin.
Some MD's are very leery of
this new intrusion into their prescribing habits. Dr. Clark, assistant
professor of philosophy at Union College in Schenectady, N.Y., voiced his
concerns by saying, "Any time we sense a third party looking over the
shoulders of our doctors, and especially when that third party is the long
arm of governmental authority, we feel our right to confidentiality is
threatened and subject to the possibility of compromise."
In an opinion from the
pro-side of this issue, William Douglass, executive director of the West
Virginia Board of Pharmacy states "If they do their job to verify the
legitimate need for [the prescription] and do a good job of monitoring their
patient's pain management, they should have no fear of repercussion. If they
don't do their job and are writing prescriptions like candy, they should
have fear because this program can pinpoint it."
Chiropractic's Role in
Sports
As
more athletes discover the benefits of chiropractic care not only for
injuries but additionally for increased performance, more athletes and teams
are using chiropractic to gain an important edge. A recent study
published in the March/April 2002 issue of the Journal of Manipulative and
Physiological Therapeutics, (JMPT) examined the usage of chiropractic
care by National Football League teams throughout the US.
The Journal article reported on the results
of a survey of NFL trainers on their usage and referral to chiropractic
care. Participants of the survey were head athletic trainers of the 36
National Football League teams. They were all men, and all had at least 17
years of experience and had served with their present team in their current
position for a minimum of 1 year .
The results of the survey showed that 45%
percent of the trainers themselves have been treated by a chiropractor.
Presently 31% of NFL teams use chiropractors in an official capacity as part
of their staffs. However, even though not necessarily on the staff of the
NFL team a full 77% of the trainers have referred to a chiropractor for
evaluation or treatment. Probably the most telling result of the
survey is that 100% of trainers agree that some players use chiropractic
care without referral from team medical staff.
Several other questions were also asked in
the survey and the answers were as follows:
-
Should trainers refer players with
suspected spinal subluxations to chiropractors? - Five percent of
trainers strongly agree, 48% agree, 24% disagree, and 19% have no
opinion.
-
Is there a role for the doctor of
chiropractic in the NFL? - Eighty-one percent agree that there is a role
for the chiropractor in the NFL, 5% strongly agree, 14% have no opinion,
and none disagree.
-
Is the role of the sport chiropractor
different from that of the team physician? - All (100%) of the trainers
see these roles as different from each other.
In addition to NFL players, many athletes
from many sports depend on chiropractic care. One
such athlete is John Stockton, a professional basketball player and future
hall of famer with the Utah Jazz. In an April 2, 2002 article that
appeared in the Toronto Star, writer Doug Smith asks
and answers the question concerning John Stockton's longevity, "What is
the secret to John Stockton's continued success on the NBA basketball court
at age 40? A Good Chiropractor." When asked to explain his usage
of chiropractic John's response was, "I'm not a good enough expert on
what that (chiropractic) entails, but it's not just adjustments, it's
balancing muscles and overall health." John then added, "it's been
great for me, and for my family." The article reports that along
with chiropractic, Stockton says that a love for the game and fun with his
family are two other secrets to his continued success.
New Drugs May Not Be
Safe
In an April 30, 2002, Associated Press
report, came a story based on a May 1, 2002 article in the Journal of
the American Medical Association (JAMA) that claims that many newly released
drugs are still dangerous when released because not enough is known about
them before they are released into the market. The AP story begins with a
dangerous warning, "One in five new drugs has serious side effects that
do not show up until well after the medicine has received government
approval." 
The study published in JAMA was conducted at
the Department of Medicine, Cambridge Hospital and Harvard Medical School,
and also starts off with an ominous statement, "Recently approved drugs
may be more likely to have unrecognized adverse drug reactions (ADRs) than
established drugs, but no recent studies have examined how frequently
postmarketing surveillance identifies important ADRs." The JAMA
article goes on to say, "Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are believed to
be a leading cause of death in the United States. Prior to approval, drugs
are studied in selected populations for limited periods, possibly
contributing to an increased risk of ADRs after approval. Pharmaceutical
companies frequently market new drugs heavily to both patients and
clinicians before the full range of ADRs is ascertained."
This study suggests that in many cases newer
drugs are not fully understood, or their reactions fully known before the
general public is given them. Robert J. Temple, MD; and Martin H.
Himmel, MD, also commented in the same JAMA issue by warning that even those
who check common sources for drug reactions may not be getting the full
story. They stated, "Use of the Physicians' Desk Reference
to
determine the timing of the labeling change is convenient, but does not give
an accurate measure." Additionally, they commented, "Premarketing
trials in a few thousand (usually relatively uncomplicated) patients do not
detect all of a drug's adverse effects, especially relatively rare
ones."
The results of the study as published in JAMA
showed that out of a total of 548 new drugs that were approved in 1975-1999;
56 (10.2%) acquired a new 'black box' warning or were withdrawn. Forty-five
drugs (8.2%) acquired 1 or more black box warnings and 16 (2.9%) were
withdrawn from the market. In Kaplan-Meier analyses, the estimated
probability of acquiring a new black box warning or being withdrawn from the
market over 25 years was 20%.
Black box warnings are special warnings that
are prominently displayed in the Physicians' Desk Reference to alert
practitioners to serious risks. According to the Federal Register; special
problems, particularly those that may lead to death or serious injury, may
be required by the Food and Drug Administration to be placed in a
prominently displayed box, known as the 'black box'.
The conclusion of the researchers was,
"Serious ADRs commonly emerge after Food and Drug Administration
approval. The safety of new agents cannot be known with certainty until a
drug has been on the market for many years."
Association Between
Duration of Breastfeeding and Adult Intelligence
From
the May 8, 2002 issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association (
JAMA) reports a study that suggests that the longer an infant breast feeds,
the more likely their intelligence level will be higher when they become an
adult. According to the study the results showed that the duration of
breastfeeding was associated with significantly higher scores on the Verbal,
Performance, and Full Scale IQs testing.
The study was conducted in a sample of 3253
men and women, all of whom were born in Copenhagen, Denmark, between October
1959 and December 1961. The subjects were divided into 5 categories based on
duration of breastfeeding, as assessed by physician interview with mothers
at a 1-year examination. The average results showed that for infants
that breast fed for less than 1 month the average adult IQ at age 27 was
99.4. Conversely infants that breast fed for more than 9 months showed
an average IQ at age 27 of 104.0. Infants in between the breast
fed durations of less than one month and more than 9 months showed IQs that
were between 99.4 and 104.0.
This data convinced researchers of a direct
correlation between length of time that an infant breast feeds and the
probable adult IQ rate later in life. The researchers concluded,
"Independent of a wide range of possible confounding factors, a
significant positive association between duration of breastfeeding and
intelligence was observed in 2 independent samples of young adults, assessed
with 2 different intelligence tests."
More Children Taking
Central Nervous System Drugs
The
Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) April 17, 2002 issue
published a Health Agency Update titled, "More Children on CNS
Drugs". This article reports on a study funded by the Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality, which states that, "The
proportion of children and adolescents receiving psychotropic medicines
increased substantially between 1995 and 1999." Drugs to treat
attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) were the most commonly
prescribed CNS (Central Nervous System) medications according to the study. 
The shocking conclusion of the study was that
3% of the population under
age 20 years were receiving drugs for ADHD. The number of children
taking new antidepressant drugs jumped 195%, from 1995 to 1999. The study
reported on 750,000 children and adolescents throughout the United States
who were covered by employer-sponsored insurance. Similar trends were
also identified in earlier research on children insured by health
maintenance organizations and Medicaid.
The United States has continually had the
highest rate of usage of these types of drugs. This leads to the
inevitable question of why? The two possible answers to this question are
that either the children in the United States are more prone to
psychological problems and therefore need these drugs at a much higher level
than the rest of the world, or children in this country are greatly over
medicated because of the popularity of the diagnosis and the promotion of
the drug by the pharmaceutical industry.
Past
Newsletters |
Subscribe |
Unsubscribe
Dr. Darryl W. Roundy - © 2008 - All Rights
Reserved